From: Mark J.
Sent: June 24, 2012
To: undisclosed recipients
Subject: Fw: How does Obama avoid Prsion
Date: Friday, June 22, 2012, 5:43 PM
Here is something that would be worthy of stuffing down the internet pipe to others and see where it ends up.
I pulled this off the Orly Taitz website. It said a lot on how our political system runs with our congress right now protecting Obama from his crimes. It makes me want to have the public option of going with an un-election in November to clean out the US Capital completely. WE gave the power of impeachment to the United States Senate and those people will not act accordingly when the highest office breaks the laws. And so do the rest of them against us by covering it up. So where can we the people go to get the mess cleaned up ourselves? Legislative branch is out of the question. The Judicial branch is out of the question, and obviously so is the Administrative Branch.
We have an entire government of lawlessness. Elections? for what reason do we need them to reelect criminals?
Mark
From Colonel Sellin: How Obama avoids prison
Posted on: June 22, 2012
How Barack Obama avoids prison
06.15 . 2012
By Lawrence Sellin
A political deal will be struck to save the Democrat Party from total collapse and protect the Republican Party from revelations of complicity in the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on the American people.
A growing number of Americans are now learning that Barack Obama, according to Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of the U. S. Constitution, is an illegal President. The law requires a candidate for the Presidency to be a “natural born citizen,” that is, a second generation American, a U.S. citizen, whose parents were also U.S. citizens at the time of the candidate’s birth.Obama’s father was a citizen of Kenya and a British subject at the time of his birth, which made him forever ineligible for the Presidency.
Practically speaking, that issue is not a problem for Obama because the Republican Party also wants to violate the Constitution. Many Republicans are aggressively advocating Florida Senator Marco Rubio as Mitt Romney’s Vice Presidential candidate. Rubio is ineligible because, even though he was born in the United States, his parents were Cuban citizens at the time of his birth.
Since 1975, both Democrat and Republican politicians have been trying unsuccessfully to amend Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of the U. S. Constitution. The election of Obama has allowed them to do so, not legally, but by fait accompli.
According to the wishes of Democrat and Republican politicians, Terrorist Anwar al-Awlaki, killed by a drone strike on September 30, 2011, was eligible to be President because he was born in New Mexico of Yemeni parents. Al-Awlaki was the “spiritual leader” of al-Qaida in the Arabian peninsula, whose sermons at the Dar al-Hijrah Islamic Center in Falls Church, Virginia was attended by two hijackers who carried out the 9/11 attacks, Nawaf al-Hamzi and Hani Hanjour. Likewise, accused Fort Hood shooter and alleged al-Awlaki disciple, Nidal Malik Hasan, is eligible to be President because he was born in Virginia of Palestinian parents.
There are also persistent questions about the authenticity of Obama’s birth certificate, Selective Service registration and his use of a Social Security number not issued to him, all serious crimes with the potential for lengthy prison sentences.
The law, however, is not a problem for Obama because any serious investigation would implicate far too many Democrat and Republican politicians. That is why the political establishment and the media are suppressing every effort to uncover the truth about Obama’s personal history because it would expose their own corruption and hypocrisy.
The greatest danger to Obama is the potential collapse of the Democrat Party from the failed policies engineered by his Administration and the Party’s progressive wing.
The Clinton faction and other Democrats outside of Obama’s circle of supporters now fear he may be leading the Party, not only to certain electoral defeat, but to political oblivion. They are actively working behind the scenes, likely with the collusion of Republicans, to ensure Obama’s defeat or, perhaps, even quietly to force him out of the 2012 Presidential contest. They all have a vested interest in maintaining the balance of power of the political status quo, which an Obama victory would permanently alter.
An Obama win would, for example, forever eliminate Clinton Democrats as a political factor and nullify all the Republican economic arguments, which represent the core of the Romney campaign.
In general, however, politicians’ concern for the well-being of country exists only in the context of the power they wield and the health of their financial portfolios and that is the essence of the Obama threat that they perceive.
Much can happen between now and November to determine whether or not the non-Obama Democrat and Republican coalition will succeed. Will Attorney General Eric Holder be forced to resign paving the way for other investigations? Will there be selective leaks to embarrass Obama? Will the financiers and liberal media turn against him? Will Obama be privately black-mailed or promised a pardon?
The fate of Obama has already been determined, not by voters, but by powerbrokers using tactics that will unfold over the coming months.
There is one thing, however, that is certain. Regardless of who wins in November, Obama’s alleged crimes will never be fully investigated and his personal history will never be exposed by either Democrat or Republican politicians. Their involvement in a conspiracy of silence is unmistakable and their protection of Obama stems solely from political self-interest.
Barack Obama has been issued a “get out of jail free” card by a corrupt political establishment and a dishonest media.
Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is a retired colonel with 29 years of service in the US Army Reserve and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq. Colonel Sellin is the author of “Afghanistan and the Culture of Military Leadership”. He receives email at lawrence.sellin@gmail.com
Obama was born in Hawaii, as his birth certificate and the repeated confirmation of Hawaii officials of both parties shows.
ReplyDeleteHere is the latest confirmation:
http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obamabirthbook.com/2012/06/hawaii-very-officially-verifies-barack-obamas-birth-certificate/
That was preceded by the confirmation to Arizona, which was accepted as proof by Arizona’s conservative Republican secretary of state, and that was preceded by the director of health of Hawaii saying that she had seen the original birth certificate in the process of being copied onto security paper to make the official copy, and that the official copy was accurate, and that that was what she gave to Obama’s lawyer. Further back ther were confirmations by Republican officials before the presidential election, and again about a year after it, and then by the Republican governor of Hawaii.
These confirmations are further supported by the “Index Data”—a public file of the birth certificates that are on file, and it shows that there is a birth certificate file for Obama under 1961. And, of course, there is also the birth notices in the Health Bureau Statistics section of the Hawaii newspapers in 1961. As the name shows, the items in the Health Bureau Statistics section were only sent to the papers by the DOH of Hawaii, and at the time the DOH only sent out such notices for births IN Hawaii.
The meaning of Natural Born Citizen refers to the place of birth, not to the parents:
“Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are "natural born citizens" and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are "natural born citizens" eligible to serve as President ..."---- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005) [Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]