HILLARY CLINTON SIGNS THE U.N.'s SMALL ARMS TREATY

From: Michelle M.

Sent: April 30, 2012

To: undisclosed recipients

Subject: Fw: HILLARY CLINTON SIGNS THE U.N.'s SMALL ARMS TREATY

HILLARY CLINTON DEFIES THE CONSTITUTION:

IN DEFIANCE OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION SHE SIGNED THE UN's "SMALL ARMS TREATY". WHAT?
ISN'T SHE GUILTY OF TREASON?

Yes - I agree. This is a VERY SERIOUS WARNING. And, yes there will be conflict. It seems we're
long past the point of no return. I sense that BO hopes there will be conflict. WHY? So he can impose
MARTIAL LAW. If you were BO, how would you defend yourself from angry Patriots who support
the 2nd Amendment?

One of Newton's Laws: For every ACTION there is an equal and opposite REACTION.
#1 - HOW do we "REACT"?
#2 - WHERE do we "REACT"?
#3 - WHEN do we "REACT"?

Might it be a good time for PATRIOT's to start organizing? Quietly. Effectively.
As our CONSTITUTION and FREEDOMS are destroyed, it's obvious that THERE WILL BE CONFLICT.

I agree that the future of our Republic is very shaky. I'm sending this to everyone I can - "bcc".
(Thanks Bill.) Michelle.
---------------------------------------------------------------

OBAMA FINDS LEGAL WAY AROUND THE 2ND AMENDMENT AND USES IT.
IF THIS PASSES, THERE could BE CIVIL WAR

On Wednesday - 25th of April 2012 - Obama Took the First Major Step in a Plan to Ban All Firearms in the United States

On Wednesday the Obama administration took its first major step in a plan to ban all firearms in the United States . The Obama administration intends to force gun control and a complete ban on all weapons for US citizens through the signing of international treaties with foreign nations. By signing international treaties on gun control, the Obama administration can use the US State Department to bypass the normal legislative process in Congress. Once the US Government signs these international treaties, all US citizens will be subject to those gun laws created by foreign governments. These are laws that have been developed and promoted by organizations such as the United Nations and individuals such as George Soros and Michael Bloomberg. The laws are designed and intended to lead to the complete ban and confiscation of all firearms. The Obama administration is attempting to use tactics and methods of gun control that will inflict major damage to our 2nd Amendment before US citizens even understand what has happened.

Obama can appear before the public and tell them that he does not intend to pursue any legislation (in the United States) that will lead to new gun control laws, while cloaked in secrecy, his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton is committing the US to international treaties and foreign gun control laws. Does that mean Obama is telling the truth?
What it means is that there will be no publicized gun control debates in the media or votes in Congress. We will wake up one morning and find that the United States has signed a treaty that prohibits firearm and ammunition manufacturers from selling to the public. We will wake up another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that prohibits any transfer of firearm ownership. And then, we will wake up yet another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that requires US citizens to deliver any firearm they own to the local government collection and destruction center or face imprisonment. This has happened in other countries, past and present!

THIS IS NOT A JOKE NOR A FALSE WARNING.
As sure as government health care will be forced on us by the Obama administration through whatever means necessary, so will gun control. Read the Article U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States reversed policy on Wednesday and said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics said gave every nation a veto. The decision, announced in a statement released by the U.S. State Department, overturns the position of former President George W. Bush's administration, which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national controls were better. View The Full Article Here